Yes it makes sense but I think it would be helpful to put a reminder such
as:

select the cells scheduled with A and marked as *RX *(therefore TX from B
point of view).

There is enough space for it and it won't hurt :-)

Le jeu. 2 févr. 2017 à 17:30, Qin Wang <[email protected]> a écrit :

> Hi Remy,
>
> Regarding to your question on 4.2.6.  6P CellOptions, the first column is
> the cell's type from node A's point of view, and the second column is the
> cell's type from node B's point of view. Does it make sense?
>
> Thanks
> Qin
>
>
> On Thursday, February 2, 2017 8:09 AM, Remy Leone <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I got a bunch of remarks about the 6P draft
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-03
>
> *4.1.1. 2-step 6top Transaction*
> *4.1.2. 3-step 6top Transaction*
>
> Maybe it would be nice to add at the end of the workflow that if the
> transaction was successful, the schedule generation is incremented to allow
> inconsistencies detection.
>
> *4.2.4. 6P Command Identifiers*
>
> CMD_CLEAR: Maybe it would be a good idea to specify whether it soft, hard
> or both cells that are concerned.
>
> *4.2.6. 6P CellOptions*
>
> In Figure 11, is there is mix-up between line 2 & 3
> TX=1, *RX=0*, S=0 | select the cells scheduled with A and marked as *RX*
> *TX=0*, RX=1, S=0 | select the cells scheduled with A and marked as *TX*
>
> and the line 6 & 7?
>
> *TX=1*, RX=0, S=1 | select the cells scheduled with A and marked as *RX*
> and SHARED
> TX=0, *RX=1*, S=1 | select the cells scheduled with A and marked as *TX*
> and SHARED
>
> TX and RX don't seem to match.
>
> Also, I think it would be useful to define what SHARED means, I fail to
> find the definition in this draft.
>
> *4.3.6. Clearing the Schedule*
>
> I think it would be a good idea to specify whether it's hard cells or soft
> cells (or both) that are concerned by this.
>
> *6. Implementation Status*
>
> Support for 6P in Wireshark was merged upstream
>
> https://github.com/wireshark/wireshark/commit/8b0e66f22c059533643195ba7571cafe9f006f58
> Therefore there is a need to update the text concerning the Wireshark
> dissector.
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Rémy
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6tisch mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to