Thomas,
During the last Webex I commented that
I used these comments to modify and correct
the draft. I eliminated (almost) every instance of
"effectively used cell" and fixed the problems
raised by Randy.
Regards,
Diego
2017-03-28 9:31 GMT-03:00 Thomas Watteyne <[email protected]>:
> @Diego, @Authors,
> Any comments?
> Thomas
>
> On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Yasuyuki Tanaka <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Nice comments!
>>
>> I also want to see the definition of "effectively used cell" and
>> how to calculate PDR.
>>
>> In addition, I don't think that we would count the number of
>> cells used for 6P in terms of SF0. Is it correct? In any case,
>> some text on how SF0 should handle traffic or cell usage by 6P
>> would be helpful.
>>
>> Best,
>> Yatch
>>
>>
>> On 2017/03/05 11:20, Randy Turner wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> After reading the current SF0 document, I had a few nits that I thought
>>> I would pass along - hope they’re helpful.
>>>
>>>
>>> Section 2: Introduction
>>>
>>> (The Scheduling Algorithm)
>>>
>>> “…under effective use…” the choice of wording seems unorthodox.
>>>
>>> Suggest the following “A portion of these allocated cells will be
>>> effectively utilized by neighbors, while the remaining cells can be
>>> over-provisioned to handle unanticipated increases in cell requirements”
>>>
>>> (The Relocation Algorithm)
>>>
>>> “Allocated cells may experiment packet loss” should be “Allocated cells
>>> may experience packet loss…”
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Section 4: SF0 Triggering Events
>>>
>>> 1. “…change in the current number of used cells” - could this be
>>> paraphrased to say “…a change in the number of required cells” ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Section 5: SF0 Estimation Algorithm
>>>
>>> The Cell Estimation Algorithm steps, # 2 - What is an “effectively” used
>>> cell? Could this just say “Collect the current number of used cells” ?
>>>
>>> There is actually quite a bit of emphasis in this document on the idea
>>> of an “effectively used cell” - perhaps we should explain the concept of an
>>> effectively used cell (or a reference if it’s already defined) - I was
>>> curious why the term “effective” is used so often? In the “Cell Estimation
>>> Algorithm” Step #2, the text reads:
>>> “Collect the current number of effectively used cells” — which would
>>> seem to imply that ineffectively used cells wouldn’t be included in this
>>> step. This may seem a too literal interpretation, I’m just looking for
>>> clarity as to whether or not the term “effective” or “effectively” is
>>> really needed in the doc.
>>>
>>>
>>> Section 11: Relocating Cells
>>>
>>> Just for completeness, I would emphasize how PDR is calculated, or
>>> include a reference to some other document if defined elsewhere
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for this work!
>>> Randy
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 6tisch mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 6tisch mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
>>
>
>
>
> --
> _______________________________________
>
> Thomas Watteyne, PhD
> Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria
> Sr Networking Design Eng, Linear Tech
> Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN
> Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH
>
> www.thomaswatteyne.com
> _______________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6tisch mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
>
>
--
DIEGO DUJOVNE
Profesor Asociado
Escuela de Informática y Telecomunicaciones
Facultad de Ingeniería - Universidad Diego Portales - Chile
www.ingenieria.udp.cl
(56 2) 676 8125
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
