Hi Remy,

this is a concurrent situation so both should happen almost at the same
time. The return code to 6N2 is BUSY.

regards,
X

2017-06-19 16:37 GMT+02:00 Remy Leone <[email protected]>:

> Hello,
>
> I got a question about 6P04:
>
>   obj: Check that concurrent transaction cannot request for the same cells
> in the schedule according to draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-05
>   cfg: star
>   ref: IEEE802.15.4-2015, draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-05
>   pre:
>     - The DAGroot sends EBs periodically, with a fast rate (equal to 10
> sec, according to IEEE802.15.4std), so that the 6N does not need to send
> KAs for keeping synchronization.
>     - All EB packets are sent on a single frequency.
>     - Power on DAGroot.
>     - Wait until all 6N join the DAGroot
>   seq:
>     - s:
>         - The 6N1 sends a 6P ADD request to the DAGroot for 2 slots.
>         - The candidate list is {4,5}.
>     - s:
>         - The 6N2 sends a 6P ADD request to the DAGroot for 2 slots.
>         - The candidate list is {4,5}.
>     - c:
>         - Check that the returned code for the operation is BUSY.
>
> Should we add more details about the timing? Because the check step seems
> very imprecise. Is it the 6N2 that get the busy return code? The 6N1? Do we
> have answers each time a request is sent?
>
> Best regards
>
> Rémy
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6tisch mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
>
>


-- 
Dr. Xavier Vilajosana
Wireless Networks Lab

*Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3)Professor*
(+34) 646 633 681
[email protected] <[email protected]>
http://xvilajosana.org
http://wine.rdi.uoc.edu
Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia
Av Carl Friedrich Gauss 5, B3 Building
08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona). Catalonia. Spain
[image: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya]
­
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to