Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]> wrote:
    > * Thomas: What is missing? is it ready, are there todos?


    > * Malisa: Details in the proxy mechanism. As of now, fine for 6TiSCH
    > but not generic for CoAP use case, make the proxy option
    > decryptable for others.


    > * Malisa: Biggest issue is status of EDHOC draft.

we anticipate a possible phone call before IETF99, with a meeting at IETF99
to resolve things.  Apparently, re-opening COSE WG has been considered.


--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to