In Thomas' example https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-munoz-6tisch-examples-00#section-3.6.1 there is a page dispatch to page 1 (0xf1) followed by IPHC (no routing header). In this case, couldn't one choose to elide the page dispatch and directly include IPHC? Or is the IPHC different from a page 0 IPHC? Just checking if we're on the same page (no pun intended ;))
Thanks, Simon On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 1:41 AM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thomas Watteyne <[email protected]> wrote: > > Simon, all, FYI, we agreed on Friday that using paging dispatch is the > > right way forward. I propose we continue discussing on the plugtests > > ML if that's going to create problems. > > Yes, but the point is that a non-6loRH node will not be able to decode other > than "page 1", and we have no signaling mechanism to tell a 6loRH node to > "fall back". > > That was intentional... We discussed having a flag in the RPL DIO to say if > there were old nodes present, but decided it wasn't worth it. > > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > > _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
