All,

I did a full review of draft-thubert-6lo-forwarding-fragments-05. PDF, with
many comments, attached.

I had reviewed -04 in March [1]. Overall, I believe the document is now
much clearer. The format it proposes and the way it works is clearly
understandable by an implementer such as myself. I very much like the fact
that "discussion items" (rationale, requirements, etc) are pushed to
appendices; they tend to confuse me if placed on top of the document.

To summarize, I believe fragment forwarding is important to have in any
6LoWPAN network, and that the mechanism described in this draft solves it.
Happy to discuss at the IETF99 6lo session this afternoon.

Thomas

[1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo/current/msg02340.html

-- 
_______________________________________

Thomas Watteyne, PhD
Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria
Sr Networking Design Eng, Linear Tech
Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN
Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH

www.thomaswatteyne.com
_______________________________________

Attachment: draft-thubert-6lo-forwarding-fragments-05_tw.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to