Randy Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > We have AMI networks of 4000+ nodes, and we currently employ > proprietary techniques similar to what is described to address all > manner of saturation we see. Any effort to standardize methods for > alleviating these issues would be welcome, as was the past drafts (and > any future drafts) on neighbor table management, which is a related > issue.
That's exciting to hear!!! Is there anything that needs to be added in this Proxy Priority to permit you to replace your proprietary mechanism with what is here being proposed? (Note I am sticking to the word "priority" rather than preference, but I'm open to omitting the word Join if it would be confusing) -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
