I agree – the architecture document has undergone revision to include sufficient text to basically describe the sublayer, so the reference is probably not needed.
R. From: 6tisch <[email protected]> on behalf of "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 3:09 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [6tisch] FW: architecture document Hello Randy : For some reason this was bounced by the ML. yes, I agree this reference is outdated. Since there is no other, the architecture should be self-sufficient in describing the 6top sublayer. To be improved at the next rev : ) Cheers, Pascal From: Turner, Randy <[email protected]> Sent: lundi 2 avril 2018 14:27 To: 6tisch <[email protected]> Subject: architecture document Hi All, Regarding the current 6tisch architecture document (draft-ietf-6tisch-architecture-13), the draft makes reference to I-D.wang-6tisch-6top-sublayer, which is an expired draft and it appears this draft was never picked up for additional work. Apologies if this has already been brought up. Randy
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
