Mališa Vučinić <[email protected]> wrote: > If we were to use the unspecified address, would the following be OK:
> - Join Request: L3 source: Pledge LL; L3 destination: all-zeros; L2
> source: pledge EUI; L3 destination: JP EUI from the Beacon
This may be hard to configure on some platforms/OSes.
The whole world is not OpenWSN.
A straight fe80::JPLL is just a stuffed ND entry.
Stuffing in ::/128 might not be permitted.
> - Join Response: L3 source: all-zeros; L3 destination: pledge LL; L2
> source: JP EUI; L2 destination: Pledge EUI
> (Join Request and Join Response refer to packets exchanged between the
> pledge and the JP.)
I can probably live with this.
> - avoid an ND exchange doubling communication overhead
> - avoid the need to keep a separate insecure cache at JP. How this
> would be implemented is implementation specific, one example is an
> ephemeral cache entry discussed in previous emails.
I think that this are two important things.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
