The constrained-voucher document was created out of text extracted from
draft-ietf-6tisch-dtsecurity-zerotouch-joinI will shortly (maybe today...) revise the above document to remove the common text and point at the constrained-voucher document. If you are interested in the zero-touch work in 6tisch, then please indicate so to the ANIMA WG. Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 17:33:03 +0200 From: Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: [Anima] Adoption call for draft-richardson-anima-ace-constrained-voucher (ends 05/12/2018) draft-richardson-anima-ace-constrained-voucher was presented at IETF101 and received good interest. The authors asked for adoption. As far as the chairs heard, there was no objection in the room. As new work, we discussed this with the new AD for ANIMA Ignas Bagdonas and also concluded that this work would be in scope of our current chater. We hereby are officially asking the working group to confirm adoption of this work: This message starts a two-week adoption call on: Title: Constrained Voucher Profile for Bootstrapping Protocols Name: draft-richardson-anima-ace-constrained-voucher Authors: M. Richardson, P. van der Stok, P. Kampanakis URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-anima-ace-constrained-voucher/ Please express your support or rejection. If you think this document should _not_ be adopted, please also explicitly indicate the reasons. This adoption call will end on May 12, 2018. More information as follows: This document is intended to become standards track ANIMA WG document (-03 has a format mistake indicating informational, this would be fixed). Standard track is desired because it is meant to become the required voucher format for solutions with (low-end) devices with existing or future signaling protocols. One of the candidate future signaling to use this voucher is draft-ietf-ace-coap-est. Another one is BRSKI with DTLS using the CBOR encoding proposed in the document for use cases of the FairHair association which includes members from ZigBEE, KNX and Bacnet. It would also be needed to by other 6tisch documents such as draft-ietf-6tisch-dtsecurity-zerotouch-join (from which this voucher draft was actually extracted, similarily to how voucher was extracted from BRSKI). The choice for bringing this to anima was done because of the experience with the first voucher draft, comparing possible working groups and concluding that ANIMA was best the best WG for it. Regards ANIMA chairs (Sheng & Toerless) -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
