[email protected] wrote:
    > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
directories.
    > This draft is a work item of the IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 
802.15.4e WG of the IETF.

    > Title           : 6tisch Zero-Touch Secure Join protocol
    > Authors         : Michael Richardson
    > Benjamin Damm
    > Filename        : draft-ietf-6tisch-dtsecurity-zerotouch-join-02.txt
    > Pages           : 37
    > Date            : 2018-04-30

    > Abstract:
    > This document describes a Zero-touch Secure Join (ZSJ) mechanism to
    > enroll a new device (the "pledge") into a IEEE802.15.4 TSCH network
    > using the 6tisch signaling mechanisms.  The resulting device will
    > obtain a domain specific credential that can be used with either
    > 802.15.9 per-host pair keying protocols, or to obtain the network-
    > wide key from a coordinator.  The mechanism describe here is an
    > augmentation to the one-touch mechanism described in
    > [I-D.ietf-6tisch-minimal-security], and a constrained version of
    > [I-D.ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra].

This document tries align itself section for section
with draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-15.

The notable changes compared to -01 is that all of the actual voucher
definitions (YANG, trees, CBOR,etc.) have been moved to
   draft-richardson-anima-ace-constrained-voucher

which is presently in an WG Adoption call:
   https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/anima/current/msg03521.html

Here is a section-by-section diff of this document against BRSKI.
It might not be very interesting except to compare the Table of Contents.
   https://goo.gl/21J3Ga

There are still numerous sections which are TBD.
Some of them MAY ultimately wind up empty.

I am looking for advice:  should such empty sections be removed, or should
they say, "No difference from BRSKI"?

The major bikeshed question is the "ZSJ" acronym I just made up.
(SJZ would be be easier to pronounce)

There are also some EDHOC mechanicals which I'm unclear about at this point,
and I'm trying to get clarified.


    > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
    > 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6tisch-dtsecurity-zerotouch-join/

    > There are also htmlized versions available at:
    > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6tisch-dtsecurity-zerotouch-join-02
    > 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6tisch-dtsecurity-zerotouch-join-02

    > A diff from the previous version is available at:
    > 
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6tisch-dtsecurity-zerotouch-join-02


    > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
submission
    > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

    > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
    > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

    > _______________________________________________
    > 6tisch mailing list
    > [email protected]
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

-- 
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to