I've reviewed draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-06, focusing on the parts that 
involve CoAP.

The Stateless-Proxy option is interesting. When a CoAP client (or proxy in the 
role of a client) makes a request, it usually has some state information at 
that point in time and requires that information to continue where it left off 
when receiving the response. CoAP facilitates this by the Token: an opaque 
value that is sent along the request and echoed back verbatim in the response.

When the Token was designed in the CoRE working group, we had a discussion if 
the token value should just serve as an identifier for the state information 
stored at the client, or if the client should be enabled to encode information 
directly in the token, protected by an authentication tag, which would allow 
the client to continue where it left off without keeping any state information 
in the meantime. Since we didn't have a specific use case at that time, the 
(non-reversible) decision was made to not allow it and to limit the token value 
to a maximum size of 8 bytes.

The Stateless-Proxy option overturns that decision. While I think that the 
original decision was not the best, this is really unfortunate. Not only are 
there are now two tokens in a message, which doesn't help with keeping the 
protocol simple and easy to understand; the new token is also not even always 
echoed back.

I don't see why a protocol extension is needed in the first place. It seems the 
current functionality could be achieved equally as well by passing the state 
information in the payload [1].

Seeing that Tero also has some comments on statelessness, I think that this 
part needs more work.

The other parts involving CoAP look good to me. (The prescribed URI path "j" is 
a bit suspicious since it conflicts with BCP 190, but might be fine because of 
the "6tisch.arpa" authority.)

Klaus

[1] E.g.: JP receives request from pledge, wraps that request and state 
information in a new payload, makes request with that payload to JRC, receives 
a response from JRC, unwraps response to pledge and state information from 
response from JRC, sends response to pledge.

_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to