Atis, While I need to answer quickly (i.e. no real answer at this point), I want stress that the feedback you're giving is hugely important and appreciated. Yes, as in all standards, getting input from implementors on how to tune parameters in the logical step as the standards themselves are being finalized. Don't hesitate to point the WG to the recommendations/tools/studies you come up with. Thomas
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 12:40 PM Yasuyuki Tanaka <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Atis, > > > So, I suggest adding a requirement/recommendation for the implementer to > prioritize 6top packets over data packets. > > I agree with you. I prefer recommendation here. > > Best, > Yatch > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > -- ________________________________________ Thomas Watteyne, PhD Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria Sr Networking Design Eng, Analog Devices Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH www.thomaswatteyne.com ________________________________________
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
