: ) I used the heavy weaponry in -25; madi minimal a normative reference and added:
" 6.7. Deeper Considerations The reader is encouraged to review the security section of [I-D.ietf-6tisch-minimal-security], which discusses 6TiSCH security issues in more details. " Works? Pascal > -----Original Message----- > From: Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> > Sent: vendredi 23 août 2019 01:49 > To: Michael Richardson <[email protected]> > Cc: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]>; =?utf- > 8?B?TWFsacWhYSBWdcSNaW5pxIc=?= <[email protected]>; Tero Kivinen > <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Intelligent JP / validating the MASA > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 05:00:39PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > > Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I’m reading a question of possibility multiple JRC whereby the pledge > > > would indicate which JRC to use and possibly leverage that for an > > > attack on anyone outside. > > > > No, the pledge intentionally has no way to signal alternate destinations. > > Cool; I think I had missed that or confused myself. > Combined with the defenses in minimal-security that Mališa pointed out, it > sounds like we're in pretty good shape. Now Pascal just has to figure out how > to point to the text in minimal-security without bloating -architecture too > much! > > Thanks, > > Ben _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
