Hello Ines, I have observed very few typos and one comment :
- time-slotted channel hopping (TSCH) —> Time-Slotted Channel Hopping (TSCH) - (the "pledge)” —> (the “pledge”) - "6LRs that see this DIO Option SHOULD increment the minimum priority if they observe congestion on the channel used for join traffic.” GP: channel here, I suppose it is ment the radio channel. Then between node A and B link, we have 16 radio channels. Thus, in stead saying … congestion on the channel, we could have … congestion on the link (or subnetwork)? - Finally, I am not sure if the standard should be written as 802.15.4 or IEEE 802.15.4. My 2 cents, Georgios > On Nov 16, 2019, at 22:11, Ines Robles > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > We kindly request for reviews of the draft > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-priority/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-priority/>, we > understand that it is ready for Last Call. > > Thank you in advance, > > Ines, Dominique and Peter > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
