Hi Yatch, The session is distinguished by the parent, there is no such case that two MSF sessions have a 'common parent'. MSF session to parent is 1 to 1 mapping relationship. MSF session should be ends as long as a neighbor is un-selected as parent.
In the text, I agree we only details how MSF deal with one parent. I think Pascal agree with this but just don't want to limit MSF to just one parent, which is clarified in the paragraph I wrote above. Tengfei On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 9:43 PM Yasuyuki Tanaka <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Tengfei, > > How do we distinguish multiple MSF sessions? > What if two MSF sessions have a same "selected parent", and then one of > them selects another selected parent? How many negotiated cells should > be taken over to the new selected parent? > > These are not covered by the current text, and I think they are out of > the scope of MSF. > > > This specification only describes how MSF works with one routing parent, > which is phrased as "selected parent". > > So, yes, I believe we should have this case only in the text. If we > mention some other possibilities without concrete ideas to implement, > they would just confuse future readers. > > I think, Pascal has a different opinion. > > Best, > Yatch > -- —————————————————————————————————————— Dr. Tengfei, Chang Postdoctoral Research Engineer, Inria www.tchang.org/ ——————————————————————————————————————
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
