Thank you, Tengfei. > On Dec 6, 2019, at 22:49, Tengfei Chang <tengfei.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Handling DSCP value will be a per-packet process. Can we pass DCSP value > to the TSCH layer using the interface for transmission defined by > IEEE802.15.4? I don't think so. > > TC: Not sure this is a standard way to do so. For implementing, tut this > value or a flag could have a default value. > TC: If this value is not given, i.e. frame from IEEE802.15.4 layer, just use > the default value.
What we would do are: - 1. don't update NumCellsUsed for AF43 packets, otherwise update them - 2. don't update NumTX/NumTxAck for AF43 packets, otherwise update them The first one may cause undesirable deallocations. If a node has relayed join request continuously for a certain period of time, the computed cell utilization (NumCellsUsed / NumCellsElapsed) goes down, then a negotiated TX cell will be deleted, even if the negotiated TX cell was scheduled to handle application traffic to forward. This behavior may degrade end-to-end reliability. The second one may prevent the node from monitoring link PDRs on scheduled cells correctly. This could affect the scheduling collision detection. Best, Yatch _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list 6tisch@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
