Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS position, cleared ] I found this document to be well written, and helpfully explained the background, issue, etc. Thank you! Question: "Pledges which have not yet enrolled are unable to authenticate the beacons, and will be forced to temporarily take the contents on faith. After enrollment, a newly enrolled node will be able to return to the beacon and validate it." Yes, this is true - a newly enrolled node will be able to do this -- but I don't see a suggestion / requirement that they actually *do* so. I'm perfectly capable of picking up my socks, but.... :-) Nit: "Although However, even in this case, a" - typo / redundancy. Please also see Qin Wu's Opsdir review (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-08-opsdir-lc-wu-2020-01-21/), which has some useful questions / nits. _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
