Dear all: A gentle reminder that RAW, DetNet and 6TiSCH are (quickly) mentioned in this document;
In particular RAW terminology is being used and it is mentioned that this work could be used to install RAW Tracks in RPL domains, with limitations (no north-south segments). Please let us know if you see anything wrong / inappropriate in that work. All the best to you all; Pascal > -----Original Message----- > From: RAW <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Pascal Thubert (pthubert) > Sent: jeudi 5 janvier 2023 10:22 > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [Raw] WGLC for draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection > > Dear all > > As you know, in particular with the discussion on the term "Track", ROLL is > reusing terminology from RAW. This is done in particular in draft-ietf-roll- > dao-projection. > > As it goes, the draft also has a discussion on how the specification could be > used for RAW in section 3.7.2.4 https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf- > roll-dao-projection-31.html#name-providing-for-raw. > > There's also a snippet on how this spec can be used to extend 6TiSCH > capabilities, and how it could be mapped into the DetNet architecture, as > sections 3.7.2.1 and 3.7.1.2 respectively. > > During his A-D review, Alvaro indicated that we should have formally > requested reviews from those groups as well. Sorry for failing to do that. > For those interested, please have a look at section 3.7.2 or the whole > document if you can, and provide comments with cc to the ROLL mailing list. > > All the best for this new year! > > Pascal > > -- > RAW mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/raw _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
