> erik quanstrom wrote: > > > that's cause it's 2^80 not 2^60. did i mistype? > > Thank goodness! Now I can sleep... > > -- > Wes Kussmaul
maybe not. it's just 1024 times more likely that you will. - erik
> erik quanstrom wrote: > > > that's cause it's 2^80 not 2^60. did i mistype? > > Thank goodness! Now I can sleep... > > -- > Wes Kussmaul
maybe not. it's just 1024 times more likely that you will. - erik