-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The required introspection is about how we function as an open source
community, I suspect.
We don't fit the usual open source mold, and generally cooperate
quite poorly with one another (with some notable exceptions).
Our projects aren't particularly well integrated, and don't lead in a
coherent directions.
Probably they made the right decision, unless we choose to address
these issues. We might not *want* to address these issues, but we
should be aware of them.
Paul
On 18-Mar-08, at 9:26 AM, Iruata Souza wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Skip Tavakkolian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
perhaps a little introspection is needed. was it that they didn't
like
the proposals this year or that they didn't like the outcome of last
year's effort?
or maybe they just want to spread their love.
last year's big problem was the number of failed projects, not the
effort made by the organization.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFH3/a0pJeHo/Fbu1wRAruXAKC28cziwYbjKzMuv3+XA2LVjzTXNACguAV6
OquW4Z+MVv4lJ5C5nnqt9nI=
=s+eo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
