well the gcc list is still waiting for you ... maybe it was volatile. brucee
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Robert William Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Iruata Souza wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I don't care if you agree with Bill Gates on the issue. The problem > >> is that everyone has about 30 different ways of solving the problem > >> and there isn't a definite solution that will cause something to > >> break. Let's face it -- this is 98.438604% futile. > >> > > > > see, even facing this percentage of futileness, you haven't bothered > > yourself to think what are you doing here. > > This is what I love about this list. It's sooo relevant to system software. > >
