* Brian L. Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080505 20:50]: > Once again, I find myself in the unhappy, but familiar, > place of being befuddled by security/authentication. > Backstory: After fighting with flaky disk drives and > scary RAID controllers, I have a system set up as a > CPU server running fossil+venti, and I want to play > around with it acting as a file server in a mixed > environment. I've got authentication set up enough > so that I can drawterm in. But: > > If /bin/service/tcp564 has exec /bin/exportfs -s > On the cpu server: 9fs tcp!127.1 works as if > I am none--can't write. > Using P9P: 9 srv -a xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx test > reports rx: exportfs: authentication not required > and upon mounting it behaves as if I'm none > > If /bin/service/tcp564 has exec /bin/exportfs -s -a > On the cpu server: 9fs tcp!127.1 reports: > srv tcp!127.1: mount failed: EOF receiving fversion reply > Using P9P: 9 srv -a xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx test > reports: srv: Tversion: bad length in 9P2000 message header > > Factotum is running in both cases. What am I doing > wrong? I'm trying to mount the server's file system > and authenticate in. I must be missing something > fundamental.
You did set up a user in fossil with fossilcons(8) right? Kind regards, Christian -- You may use my gpg key for replies: pub 1024D/47F79788 2005/02/02 Christian Kellermann (C-Keen)
pgpHvHZaQTB0p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
