> Why don't we reach an agreement and start using the very
> same format. I suggest keeping my mbox format but adapting upas/fs to
> understand it, which is a good idea. But I'm open to suggestions.

...  and use base64 encoding of attachment names so they can be
displayed correctly (by a clever function) and yet not interfere with
the directory structure.

Count me in, I'm extremely interesting in giving Plan 9 the hottest
mail handling on the planet.  I'll deal with the privacy encoding and
decoding, specially if others keep me on track.

++L


Reply via email to