On 7/3/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I dislike this idea. I think for most people, most of the time, > the lines acme's working with will fit well within the width of > a window. Yeah, I bet most of us have run into longer lines at > times, but the interface is optimized for the common case. I > wouldn't like to see that go. > > Having the "undo" (paralleling the "undo" of a 1-2, 1-3 chord) > is very nice. The feature is certainly *not* "useless" for not > being 100% reliable; what's it' off by, a line? Even that's a > "good enough" job for your eye to find the line quick enough. > Anthony
Then probably my eyes are just too slow:( It really doesn't work with me. But probably I'm getting old?!
