>> i'm interested in netbsd as a replacement for linux to serve 9p in >> small ARM machines... i could use this > > Why not Inferno? (Native or hosted) > > uriel > >
thanks, i'd overlooked that option I must say though that having to re-target to limbo is a minus. Is there a 'plan9 c' to dis compiler? The new slew of virtual interfaces are cool because they are somewhat transparent with respect to the existing interface; i.e., machine code in the general case, i'd like a non-linux platform to take plan9 (not inferno) to more machines i am not intending to knock inferno. But does it not seem to have missed the boat as a unifying platform, and now is more of a niche, 'embedded' solution ? (Maybe though this was intended all along.) I seem more interested today in broadly employing the more general virtual interfaces such as vx32, lguest, kvm, qemu, etc nkl
