On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:21 AM, erik quanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Obviously Plan 9's compiler >> isn't optimal.. but what really are the requirements people > > really? that depends on your definition of optimal. > by my definition which heavily rates speed of compliation > and correctness, it's sure closer than the competition.
for people whose programs run in time units measured in 1/4 years, compilation speed as an issue is in the noise. ron
