On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Wendell xe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seeking an alternative to vi and emacs, I've been giving Acme a try > (acme-sac, actually). After reading the articles and man pages and playing > with it for a few days, I'll admit I don't see how Acme could be even > remotely competitive with vim/emacs for editing code. >
You have to learn it. If you want emacs and vi, you won't get them with acme -- besides, you already had them, remember? Acme is a very nice tool. But you have to climb the learning curve, and there's no escaping it. I don't know how else to put it. Most times, I use acme, but still use emacs and vi as well. They are different. FWIW, there's lots of people who think emacs and vi are a joke for code use, and use the more sophisticated IDEs out there. To each his own. ron
