On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 6:11 PM, sqweek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Eric Van Hensbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> I have two measurements of success: >> a) what keeps me working on Plan 9 related technologies in a paid position >> b) what switches people from using NFS, GPFS, or other horribly >> complicated solutions to something closer to Plan 9 > > Fair enough. Does .L still qualify as "closer to Plan 9", or is it > NFS by any other name?
well it's pretty different from NFS. > Please excuse the inflammatory phrasing - that's an honest question. > I'm very ignorant about NFS and its differences from 9p, other than > the number of message types. They're utterly different, at every level. Yes, they give you a similar service, but ... ron
