On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But along the very same line of thought -- wouldn't it also then be
> much more reasonable to stick with an "alternative aname"
> approach when adopting 9P for symlinks, FIFOs and the
> rest of the POSIX paraphernalia?
>
> You pay with a slightly more complicated server, but you
> reap a huge benefit in a form of:
>
> term% srvssh unix unix-fs
> term% mount /srv/unix-fs /n/unix-fs
> term% mount /srv/unix-fs /n/unix-fs-symlinks posix-symlinks
I wasn't aware of anyone looking for this particular functionality.
We look forward to your server implementation(s).
-eric
