Again, just say *no* to xml, even the web 2.0 fools have given it up.
I agree. Web 2.0 is for fools.
I don't agree. Say yes to XML because you have to say yes to some markup
language anyway. Why not give the yes to an eXtensible one with a zillion
applications already, from TEI to DocBook to DITA to RSS to what have you?
And don't tell me you had SGML in mind.
--On Tuesday, November 25, 2008 11:34 PM +0100 Uriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
xml? Just say *no*.
And BTW, steve's libxml is far from usable and doesn't really
implement the complete standard (but who can blame him? the libxml2
people have been working on their implementation for years, and it is
still full of bugs and security issues, not to mention insanely slow).
Again, just say *no* to xml, even the web 2.0 fools have given it up.
uriel
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Federico G. Benavento
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hola,
I was wondering if I have to use all the APE to use the library for
writing a Plan 9 application.
as it says it's an APE port, that means you have to use the APE api with
it, I see no point in writing a native app using libxml2, if I needed to
doing some xml I'd use something like steve's libxml
/n/sources/contrib/steve/libxml.tar
--
Federico G. Benavento
