On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:16 AM, erik quanstrom <quans...@coraid.com> wrote: > On Wed Jan 7 11:58:04 EST 2009, rminn...@gmail.com wrote: >> The underlying assumption of motivation for this discussion is that >> jailing (or whatever we want to call it) is somehow a good thing. >> Given that every CPU we care about comes with virtualization hardware, >> I just can't see the point of jails -- seems like an idea whose time >> has gone, kind of like 8086 segments. >> >> If we give up on using RFNOMNT as a jailing mechanism, do the concerns >> really make any sense? >> >> ron > > arm has virtualization?
Some do. ARMs are so cheap ... don't jail things, just get another one. ron
