On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 20:47 -0500, erik quanstrom wrote: > i apologize for the silly question, but > my p9p-fu is quite weak. > > is the reason that plan 9 import is not > part of p9p other than it was not needed? > (of course the ssh-based import is included, > but i believe that is something else entirely.) > > i'm not dead set on import, but i do require > authentication and will be talking to a cpu > server, not a fs.
I had a very similar question about export (and there's a chance I'll port it for some of the stuff that I do) so not having import provides a nice symmetry at least ;-) Thanks, Roman.
