>> You're missing the beauty of 9p. Who needs dynload() when you have mount()? > > Mount allows me to add new names to the process namespace. Dynload > allows me to call functions or access data in a library that is not > known to the process (e.g., scripting language interpreter) until > runtime. They solve different problems.
there is no fundamental reason they could not solve the same problem. why are you so keen to remove the rpc? - erik
