I also use to put a sleep 1 in there. On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:01 PM, matt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If somebody wants to do such a thing (which all we agree is a bad >> idea) you need no new features in the shell, eg: >> while() firefox >> > > that doesn't permit a clean exit, this does : > > fn ff {firefox || ff} ; ff; > > >
- Re: [9fans] what features would you like in a shell? rapogue
- Re: [9fans] what features would you like in a shell? André Günther
- Re: [9fans] what features would you like in a shell? erik quanstrom
- Re: [9fans] what features would you like in a sh... erik quanstrom
- Re: [9fans] what features would you like in a shell? noagbodjivictor
- Re: [9fans] what features would you like in a shell? erik quanstrom
- Re: [9fans] what features would you like in a sh... michael block
- Re: [9fans] what features would you like in a shell? matt
- Re: [9fans] what features would you like in a sh... yy
- Re: [9fans] what features would you like in ... matt
- Re: [9fans] what features would you like... hiro
- Re: [9fans] what features would you... Martin Neubauer
- Re: [9fans] what features would you like in a shell? J.R. Mauro
- Re: [9fans] what features would you like in a shell? Corey
- Re: [9fans] what features would you like in a shell? John Stalker
- Re: [9fans] what features would you like in a shell? LiteStar numnums
