On Wed May 13 16:00:35 EDT 2009, [email protected] wrote:
> This is on a conventional 386 system. Compiling the linker (vl)
> failed. It could be caused by local changes, but I can't see how.
> Can anyone confirm?
>
vc is able to compile vl here. unless your source is different,
i don't see how you could fail there. here's my source
> switch(p->as) {
default:
r2 = rega();
r->link = r2;
r2->link = r1;
r2->prog = p;
r2->p1 = r;
r->s1 = r2;
r2->s1 = r1;
r1->p1 = r2;
r = r2;
t++;
case ADATA:
case AGLOBL:
case ANAME:
case ASIGNAME:
>> p = p->link;
i would think since p is not changed between the switch
and the reassignment of p, it must be that p is nil
at the switch statement, and therefore i would expect
the crash to be at > and not at >>.
- erik
