On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:54 PM, erik quanstrom<quans...@quanstro.net> wrote:
> to be precise, this is not 950 graphics:
>
> 0.2.0: vid 03.00.00 8086/2772 10 0:fe980000 524288 1:0000cc01 16
> 2:e0000008 268435456 3:fe940000 262144
> Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Device
Hmm, perhaps I am confused (it wouldn't be the first time). My
understanding was that the 82945G implements the GMA950 chipset. Come
to think of it, I'm not entirely sure why I thought that?
> the intel atom machine i've been working with keeps
> doing things i'm very happy with! i got a chance to check
> out the vesa graphics and they seem to be very well.
> 1600x1200x16 works just fine. the vga timings are perfect.
> and even pictures don't look too bad. since i'm using pat
> rather than mtrr, adding the newly-added vesa->flush()
> fixed the slight niggle i was having with a jumpy pointer.
I really wish I could do 1680x1024xwhatever.
> now if i could just get someone to build the same thing with
> intel 82574 nics....
That reminds me, I've been meaning to ask you a question. I'll send
it off-list.
- Dan C.
