On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Uriel<[email protected]> wrote: > Because the whole point of the project was to replace 9load, and the > way plan9 systems tell 9load what kernel to load is using plan9.ini
no, the point of the project was to have a new way to load that did not require 9load or 9fat or any legacy at all. I am surprised you would tie yourself down to legacy that way. Or I'm not. Do we stick with that file format forever? is it perfect and never to be changed? ron
