> > > on p. 43/44 i believe it is claimed that one > > > cannot do CSP without pure functional > > > programming. > > > > (p ⇒ q) ⇏ (¬p ⇒ ¬q) > > > > > That's interesting because pure functional programming doesn't exist at all > in the strictest sense on a computer. One MUST be able to cause side > effects during computation or your CPU will just get hot... if even that.
i read the slides as contrasts, not as logical conjunctions. i still don't understand the claim that message passing requires "thousands of message protocols" and can't do syncronization. - erik
