> I read the paper you wrote and I have some (probably naive) questions:
> The section #6 labeled "core improvements" seems to suggest that the 
> fileserver is basically using the CPU/fileserver hybrid kernel (both 
> major changes are quoted as coming from the CPU kernel).  Is this just a 
> one-off adjustment made by yourself, or have these changes been made 
> permanent?

it's not a hybrid kernel.  it is just a file server kernel.  of course
the same c library and whatnot are used.  so there are shared
bits, but not many. 

it is a one-off thing.  i also run the same fileserver at home.
the source is on sources as contrib quanstro/fs.  i don't think
anybody else runs it.

> Also, about the coraid AoE unit: am I correct in assuming that it does 
> some sort of RAID functionality, and then presents the resulting 
> device(s) as an AoE device (and nothing more)?

exactly.

> Also, another probably dumb question: did the the fileserver machine use 
> the AoE device as a kenfs volume or a fossil(+venti)?

s/did/does/.  the fileserver is running today.

the fileserver provides the network with regular 9p fileserver
with three attach points (main, dump, other) accessable via il/ip.
from a client's view of the 9p messages, fossil, fossil+venti and
ken's fs would be difficult to distinguish.

- erik

Reply via email to