> What do you think of this proposal? I think the saying is "the game is not worth the candle". I doubt anyone should invest the time and effort to implement this, specially as few will adopt its use. Of course, fifty years from now everyone would be savvy to it, but by then one expects a different environment and this type of consistency will have lost meaning.
Plus, by adding this feature you're not achieving the objective I thought you sought, which was to make the commands inherently consistent: you're retaining the inconsistency, but candy-coating it. My long-ago mentor would suggest you have not yet read Catch-22. ++L
