> btw, isn't the lockstats.locks++ in taslock:/^lock > broken since >1 loads can happen simultaneously > leading to undercounting?
sure but does it need to be 100% accurate? russ
> btw, isn't the lockstats.locks++ in taslock:/^lock > broken since >1 loads can happen simultaneously > leading to undercounting?
sure but does it need to be 100% accurate? russ