On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Russ Cox <r...@swtch.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:27 PM, andrey mirtchovski > <mirtchov...@gmail.com> wrote: > > serious question: can i have a link to the 9p implementation, pretty > > please? it doesn't appear in the module list on their website. > > There's no 9p implementation. I thought about writing one > a couple times, and I'd love to do that (I want to write acme > extensions in Go), but it hasn't been a priority. Another thorny > issue is what to name the package, since you can't start a > package name with a digit. >
I was wondering about that too and when I found out there was no 9P package for Go yet I created this project page: http://code.google.com/p/go9/. I thought go9 was a reasonable compromise for the package name given we can't start with digits, though we can change that if anyone has a better idea. There's no code in there yet because I just found out about Go a few hours ago and am still wrapping my head around it. I probably won't get something working for atleast a few weeks, so in the interim if someone wants to get started please pitch in and let's not duplicate work :-) Regards, Anant
