On 13 Jan 2010, at 4:23 pm, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> wrote:
i think you misunderstand the problem. cookiefs' fs interface
is not the issue. cookiefs' robustness when storing the cookies
on the fileserver in the face of multiple concurrently running
cookiefs' is.
ah, you're talking about the situation when multiple cookiefs
instances running on the same storage ? hmm, that's the classical
multi-access problem ;-O
but how do you get into that situation in the first place ?
(more to the point: who starts these multiple instances ?)
Wouldn't multiple instances of cookiefs neatly provide transaction
isolation?
