On Tue Mar 2 12:03:35 EST 2010, [email protected] wrote: > > The following two subroutines are defined and not used anywhere. Should they > redefined as void or possibly removed?
it's perfectly reasonable to leave code in for testing purposes that never gets called. > -int errno; > +#include <errno.h> > > should the base source include this patch? what's the advantage? the current p9p system has worked for a long time. including errno.h seems like it has the potential to break a lot of stuff. - erik
