Hello erik,

Thursday, April 15, 2010, 8:44:08 PM, you wrote:

>> main issue is interrupt count does not go below 4000. . .need to dig more 
>> into this, probably to compose a mail to the list :), but it does not hurt 
>> too much, at least for now.

> that shouldn't be happening unless you're doing a lot of disk/network
> io.

> if you're using 9atom, one would expect ~1100 interrupts/sec since
> HZ is set to 1000.  this makes timing work better and doesn't cost much
> performance.  in 9atom, /dev/irqalloc has an extra field that is the count
> of total interrupts.  i'm guessing that you have a ringing ide interrupt.
> but irqalloc should let you know who's the culprit.

> - erik


yes,  clock  is  the  one which has the count higher. . .other devices
are getting lower numbers by many orders.

gabi



-- 
Best regards,
 Gabriel                            mailto:gd...@rejaa.com


Reply via email to