Hello erik, Thursday, April 15, 2010, 8:44:08 PM, you wrote:
>> main issue is interrupt count does not go below 4000. . .need to dig more >> into this, probably to compose a mail to the list :), but it does not hurt >> too much, at least for now. > that shouldn't be happening unless you're doing a lot of disk/network > io. > if you're using 9atom, one would expect ~1100 interrupts/sec since > HZ is set to 1000. this makes timing work better and doesn't cost much > performance. in 9atom, /dev/irqalloc has an extra field that is the count > of total interrupts. i'm guessing that you have a ringing ide interrupt. > but irqalloc should let you know who's the culprit. > - erik yes, clock is the one which has the count higher. . .other devices are getting lower numbers by many orders. gabi -- Best regards, Gabriel mailto:gd...@rejaa.com