On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 8:47 AM, EBo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> your shell is broken. [0-9] are perfectly valid anywhere in a unix file >> name. > > does bash completion work for you on *anything*? Or does it get confused > thinking that you are specifying a previous command (!### in the history)? > Yes, a file/script named [0-9]* is valid, but still breaks things. Maybe > there is some trick to get around it that I do not knwo about, but the big > issues where those that the editor raised. > > EBo --
For what it's worth, ksh on OpenBSD handles completion on 9* files just fine. -sl
