> > If I do: > > usb/disk > > I get "no device found". But if instead the command is: > > usb/usbfat: > > I get /dev/sdU0.0 and /dev/sdU0.1 with plausible trees (ctl data raw). The > sdU0.0 corresponds to a usb/probe that returns: >
Are you running usbd with embedded disks? In that case the disks are owned by the usb/disk linked into usbd, and the one you start by hand should see no disks, as it happens. I'd like to confirm this, just to know if it's a bug.
