On 31 August 2010 at 11:04, erik quanstrom <[email protected]>wrote:
> i didn't suggest lock for cpu servers since it requires
> rio.  seems silly to run rio on the console just to lock it.
> and unfortunately, i think this method would also interfere
> with the serial console.  and it wouldn't be immune to
> a three-fingered salute, ^P, ^T^Tr, and other hilarity.

yeah :-) as replied to John Floren, was only a teoric question 
(an I suspected the answer). For some unix server too we let the colsole
logged. In hard crash condition also the login processo don't work, and 
having a console logged in is useful and doesn't take security away

> since there are no interrupts on the console, it would seem
> trivial to me to, ahem, lock down the console with a 10 line program.
> you'd be left with defending against ^T^Tr, ^P, etc.
> but then again, the power button or network cable is sooo
> convienent.  heck, just take the machine home.  :-P.

who care user/pass when you can pull of hard drives :-)

thanks :-)

bye

Reply via email to