On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:05 AM, ron minnich <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 4:57 AM, erik quanstrom <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> since 56%4==0, can't you correct the size mismatch by using
>> 32-bit types to prevent 64-bit 9vx from doubling the size?
>
> yep, that's what I'm doing now. I just ran out of time to finish it.

https://[email protected]/rminnich/vx32

it's done and available. This tree also includes the hack in sched.c
that avoids the exploding 9vx problem. But we need to get a real fix.



ron

Reply via email to